Missiles and motorcades cannot confer prestige
on nations without taps and toilets1
Excrement kills. It kills by the million. Lack of safe sanitation is the world’s biggest cause of infection. It is the number one enemy of world health. And it deprives hundreds of millions of people not only of health but of energy, time, dignity, and quality of life.1


How is globalisation affecting the lives of the 3.4 million inhabitants of the Angolan capital, Luanda? Can the state use wealth from oil and diamonds to lift the city’s poor out of poverty? Can civil society release the potential of the poor to become development actors?  […]

Since its foundation in the earliest phase of Portuguese colonialism in the 16th Century, Luanda has been pushed about by globalisation. Whether as a port serving the slave trade and later, colonial agriculture, or as a haven for people fleeing villages and rural towns ruined by a war prolonged by international interests, Luanda has been affected by external forces.

Most Luandans live in informal, self-constructed settlements without basic infrastructure and services. With the state budget devoted mainly to the war effort, little formal urban development has been attempted until recently. Official thinking seems dominated by the incorrect assumption that the internally displaced desire, and expect, to return home and that the musseques (shantytowns) will disappear. It is anticipated that the government may, due to the ending of the war, start forcing people to relocate into agriculture-oriented ‘growth’ poles around the capital if they do not relocate voluntarily.

Since independence, Angola has developed an economic system characterised by: the concentration of foreign investment in petroleum and diamonds; economic activity highly focused on Luanda: beyond the city boundaries, transport links and communications facilities are virtually non-existent; the collapse of almost all local production in the face of competition from imported goods; diamond and oil benefits captured by the elite with some highly inequitable trickle-down effect through the insecure, low-margin petty trading of imported goods. […] 2


Cet article a été publié dans Etat d'ame et existentiel. Ajoutez ce permalien à vos favoris.


Entrez vos coordonnées ci-dessous ou cliquez sur une icône pour vous connecter:


Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte Déconnexion /  Changer )

Photo Google

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte Google. Déconnexion /  Changer )

Image Twitter

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte Twitter. Déconnexion /  Changer )

Photo Facebook

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte Facebook. Déconnexion /  Changer )

Connexion à %s